I don't usually read craft books. I love language, but for some reason, books about how it works just bore the brain right out of my head. But I needed one for school and I'd read some of Card's stuff before, so I thought, this is as good as any, right?
It was. I'm so glad I wasn't disappointed. There aren't as many books specifically for sf / f writing as there are for writing in general, and I wanted to read one of them first, and this was a good choice. It's a little outdated, at least in the copy that I have, but it's clear, conversational, helpful, and it goes over a lot of the specific problems, shorfalls, common mistakes and details that a person writing genre has to think about.
Recommended.
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Monday, November 8, 2010
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
national geographic: july 2010
ancient human skull on the cover
table of contents here
Let me just say that I absolutely love NatGeo and I always have for as long as I can remember. Before I could read, I'd lay on my stomach on the floor at my Aunt Betty's house, looking at all the amazing pictures and being just stunned that the things in them were real, that one day I might get to see them for myself. Then, almost as soon as I could read, it seemed, I'd spend hours reading through the back issues that were always there, filling my head with information and big words and page after page of text. Maybe that's why I'm not afraid of text.
When I was maybe 17, I got my first subscription to them under my own name, and since then, I've had several. Not really consistent, since my income is not really consistent, but at least a year, at least every few years, and when I don't have a sub, I usually track down the new issues and get them individually at cover price. I've tracked down the issues from the years of birth for my entire immediate family (except my own, which seems to all be mythical). I've kept all the ones I've bought.
And my favorite ones are the ones that feature human history and archaeology. This issue doesn't disappoint, and it's beautiful. Well-written, told like the best story around, clear, informative, not too much slant that I can see (which either means it's pretty unslanted, or that my degree in anthropology slants in the same way and I don't notice it). Evocative. Exactly what I want from NatGeo. Even the little articles are amazing-- one about space junk, how it matters and how to deal with it-- a little one-pager about the worst places in America to be a pedestrian (with the top four all being in Florida!).
If I wind up working for a magazine, I want it to be NatGeo. I want to be able to say, 'I edited that to make it so pretty', or 'I wrote that article and it blends seamlessly with the 150 year history of the mag'.
I've got two more fresh issues to read, and another old one that I misplaced and never finished, and that right there is more than worth the time it takes to read a whole issue. It actually almost makes me wish I still had a two-hour each way bus ride to get to work!
Labels:
2010,
magazine,
national geographic,
review
Monday, August 9, 2010
migration by james p hogan
This book started out like a medieval fantasy and ended like a space opera, and in between, it skipped eleven years and often read like a treatise on the way people could build a better society. Even so, though, it was an interesting read, and I come out with only two complaints, and they aren't even that bad: one, I wish that it's transformation from classic scifi mode to modern scifi mode had been more complete and it had kept going, and two, I wish the situation of robot religiosity had been handled in a less definitively anthropocentric way, but even that, with all it's big words, isn't really a problem in the context of the book-- it's really the only way things could have gone.
JP Hogan died recently, and it's sad that it means there probably won't be more of these stories of these people and their trip to another world for the first time in human history, but it's a pretty optimistic way to leave the fans, I think. We really can make things better.
JP Hogan died recently, and it's sad that it means there probably won't be more of these stories of these people and their trip to another world for the first time in human history, but it's a pretty optimistic way to leave the fans, I think. We really can make things better.
Labels:
good enough,
hard scifi,
james p hogan,
review,
scifi
Sunday, June 20, 2010
gradschool: ain't she sweet?
This semester's required reading was Aint She Sweet by Susan Elizabeth Phillips.
I don't usually read romance novels any more (the first adult books I read were Victoria Holt's historical romances, but I transitioned very quickly to scifi, which I started at the same time), though I know the names of the main authors from my mom and from looking through my gramma's here-take-some-books bags. Oh, and A always had a huge selection of those twenty-something-working-girl-who-likes-to-shop books, but I've only read Bridget Jones and maybe one other. Did I read Devil Wears Prada, or just watch the movie eighty times? I don't remember.
Anyway, I meant to take a little time reading this book and post my reactions as I went, maybe every few chapters, but that sort of didn't happen. I read the whole thing in under twelve hours. That was my reaction.
A more official review:
Romance as a genre seems to have a sort of redheaded-stepchild opinion of it in the mainstream view, but this book proves that even a genre that contains things like the new-book-every-month Harlequin series can produce something fresh and strong that exists on it's own merit even if you take out the required love scenes. The romance, while the center of the story, is not the point of the narrative, but the result of it: Sugar Beth was not a nice person when she left home and now she's coming back to deal with all the heartache and ruin she left behind, and that's the point of the story. It's about how the past damages the future and how we get through that to where we need to be.
The characters are solid and distinct, for the most part (though the SeaWillows kind of blend together or come out a little one-note when they're all in the same room), and fit together the way real people do, in shifting hierarchies informed by everything that's come before and supported by mutual friendship and love, hindered by mutual grudges, changed by time but not rewritten. Fifteen years is a long time, and this book captures the distance covered in that time really well.
Additionally, as the story moves on, it becomes a little metafictional, which I always love: having a writer as a main character makes it easy, and even if the end had a little bit of a Little Women feel to it, it was the happy ending the genre requires, and it was suitable.
My only quibble is that the last third of the book went faster than the previous two-thirds, and it would have been nice to have as much time as the rest of the book got to react and ponder and guess outcomes... although that also would have meant wallowing in Sugar Beth's personal anguish, when a lot of the charm of the rest was that she doesn't really do that-- she's strong and stubborn and desperate and still manages to be principled and daring and responsible for her past actions. She's the sort of woman we kind of hope all horrible high school rich bitches can become, and she earns her happy ending.
I especially liked the characters of Sugar Beth and Colin-- even in the beginning when they don't even like each other, they fit together and draw together in a way that seems honest and organic, and the fact that they fall for each other makes perfect sense because of it.
The structure is the classic trial-of-the-heroine story, but it's handled in such a way that it seems like it's all free will-- you don't see the framework of the plot showing through and you believe the characters when they make their decisions and choose their paths. The inevitability of romance means they had to eventually wind up together, but nothing says it had to go this well or make this much sense. Nothing says it had to heal the whole town as it patched up the battered psyches of the two mains, either-- and that's what makes it above the rest of the genre and lets it cross over into something that could be labeled 'epic' almost, the fact that it's not just the story of these two people, but the story of the whole town and a little bit of the generation before them. It's aware of it's own context and it lets all that play out, while keeping it personal and realistic and intimate.
Good choice of a representative, Romance Division!
Labels:
aint she sweet,
gradschool,
required reading,
review,
romance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)